Learn · Therapy retreats

One-to-one therapy retreat or group retreat: which suits you?

A one-to-one therapy retreat is built around you, with one therapist, your own focus and your own pace. A group retreat offers shared experience, learning from others and usually a lower cost, but follows a set programme that you share with people you do not know. Which suits you depends on what you want to work on, how much privacy you need, and whether being with others would help you or hold you back.

Written by , MSc, PGDip, DipCouns, registered counsellor (ACA #27921), founder of The Centre for Intensives. Last reviewed .

The main difference is whose programme it is

In a one-to-one retreat, the programme is yours. The focus, the pace and often the setting are agreed with you, and the therapist responds to how you are doing hour by hour.

In a group retreat, the programme is shared. There is usually a set structure of sessions, teaching and activities, and you follow it alongside others. The facilitators adapt where they can, but the group moves together.

Neither is better in general. They offer different things.

How they compare

One-to-one retreat Group retreat
Focus Your own, agreed at assessment A shared theme, set by the programme
Pace Adjusted to you, hour by hour Set by the programme, with some flexibility
Depth on your own material High, because all the time is yours Lower per person, because time is shared
Privacy High: only your therapist knows what you discuss Lower: others hear some of what you share
Learning from others None A central part of the experience
Feeling less alone Comes from the therapeutic relationship Comes from the group as well
Support if you struggle Your therapist, with an agreed plan Facilitators, who are also responsible for the whole group
Assessment Should be individual and thorough Varies widely, from thorough to none
Cost Usually higher Usually lower per person

Who a one-to-one retreat tends to suit

  • People with a specific focus they want to work on in depth
  • People with trauma who need the pace adjusted closely to them
  • People with public profiles, for whom privacy matters
  • People who find groups draining, or who would hold back with others present
  • Couples who want to work on their own relationship, not alongside other couples

Who a group retreat tends to suit

  • People who want connection and shared experience as part of the work
  • People who learn well from hearing others describe similar struggles
  • People who want a structured programme on a theme, such as grief or burnout
  • People for whom cost is a deciding factor

Questions to help you decide

  1. What do I want to work on? A specific, personal focus usually suits one-to-one work. A broad theme may suit a group.
  2. How would I feel sharing with strangers? If the thought makes you want to hold back, a group may limit what you can do.
  3. How much individual attention do I need if things get hard? People with trauma histories often need a therapist whose attention is not divided.
  4. How much does privacy matter? Consider who you might meet, and what you would be comfortable having others know.
  5. What does each provider's assessment involve? A careful assessment matters more than the format.

Mixed formats

Some retreats combine the two, with a group programme and some individual sessions. This can offer shared experience alongside time for your own material. It is worth checking the balance before you book.

  • How many individual sessions are included, and how long are they?
  • Who leads the individual sessions, and are they a registered therapist?
  • Can the individual time be used for your own focus, or is it tied to the group programme?
  • If something comes up in a group session, is there individual time that day to work with it?

A mixed format can suit people who want both connection and depth. It can also leave both feeling thin if the individual time is short. A clear description of the timetable, before you pay, is a reasonable thing to ask for.

Checking who leads it

In both formats, check who is leading the work. Group retreats in particular may be led by facilitators who are not registered therapists. That is not necessarily a problem for a wellbeing programme, but it matters if the retreat involves trauma work. Ask about training, registration with a professional body and how to raise a concern. The article on how to choose a therapy retreat covers this in more detail.

Common questions

Is a group retreat less effective than one-to-one?

There is no research comparing one-to-one and group therapy retreats as formats. Group therapy has its own research base for some problems, and group settings offer things one-to-one work cannot. The right choice depends on what you want and need.

Do I have to share personal things in a group retreat?

It depends on the retreat. Most good group programmes let you choose how much to share, but the format does involve other people hearing some of what you say. Ask how sharing works before you book.

Is a group retreat a good first step if I have never had therapy?

It can be, if the retreat is designed for that and screens participants carefully. If you have a trauma history, one-to-one work with assessment is usually a safer first step, because the pace can be adjusted to you.

Can I do both?

Yes. Some people do one-to-one work on a specific focus and join a group retreat at another time for connection and shared learning. They serve different purposes.

Lucy Orton's retreats are private and one-to-one, with no groups, using Internal Family Systems and Brainspotting, in a setting in Southeast Asia chosen with each client.

Private therapy retreats

References

  1. Australian Counselling Association. Code of Ethics and Practice, version 16. theaca.net.au

This page is general information about intensive therapy. It is not a substitute for individual assessment or advice, and reading it does not create a therapeutic relationship. If you are in crisis or at risk of harm, contact local emergency services or a crisis line now. How these articles are written and checked: our editorial standards.